- #Microsoft onedrive for business 2013 pro
- #Microsoft onedrive for business 2013 software
- #Microsoft onedrive for business 2013 windows 8
#Microsoft onedrive for business 2013 pro
Their current names of Surface and Surface Pro may be simpler to use now, but it's actually more confusing for consumers, because this current naming implies Surface Pro is basically Surface, but with a few extra features.
#Microsoft onedrive for business 2013 windows 8
So they were telling people: "This is Surface with Windows RT.and this is Surface with Windows 8 Pro".īut yeah, a disaster. I think the idea was to have "one" device (even though there were actually two different devices, with very different hardware) with the name of Surface, but which came in two versions, one with Windows RT, and one with Windows 8 Pro. Typically Microsoft, the official names were "Surface with Windows RT" and "Surface with Windows 8 Pro". Is there something other than the substring 'Drive' that gives the expectation of a fully generic file synchronization tool?Īctually "Surface RT" was the "simple" version given by the community, if you can believe that. The installation process is branded all over as being a feature of Office. The OneDrive for Business (formerly SkyDrive Pro) client can be installed side-by-side with previous versions of Office (such as Microsoft Office 2010 and Microsoft 2007 Office). This sync relationship provides access to important content both online and offline. The stand-alone OneDrive for Business (formerly SkyDrive Pro) sync client lets users of Microsoft SharePoint 2013 and Microsoft SharePoint Online in Office 365 sync their personal OneDrive for Business (formerly SkyDrive Pro) document library or any SharePoint 2013 or Office 365 team site library to their local computer. It uses the terms 'library' and 'content': I found this KB which doesn't mention the term 'file' anywhere (except to refer to the downloaded installer file). Will Microsoft rewrite (or refactor) SharePoint and its form services from the ground up? Or will SharePoint 2015(?) be a rehashed v2013? And will Windows 9 come with an improved Explorer and NTFS/ReFS with better document management capabilities like that were planned for WinFS or "Microsoft Semantic Engine"? Microsoft also discontinued InfoPath, the WYSIWYG form designer that is part of Office 2003-2013 and the InfoPath form services hosted on top of SharePoint: Like the Office integration, the Office ribbon UI and some document management options that are missing from Windows Explorer thanks to the failed attempt to release WinFS in the Longhorn era. It has of course also it good values for companies. And I am not even touching the XHTML tabled based layout with thousands of CSS rules, Silverlight & ActiveX controls, bad WebDAV support, "SharePoint Groups", low soft & hard limits for file size, file count in folders, etc.
#Microsoft onedrive for business 2013 software
SharePoint (evolved as Office Server) is a beast of software and many awkward engineering & design choices from the 2003 era are still visible to the end user. I wonder if SharePoint has a future in Microsoft's strategy re-alignment. The right answer is, of course, to fire the damned PMs who serially insist on a crappy excuse for a version control system despite everyone else pushing back and saying that it sucked hard. PMs: "Please add your documentation to these folders."ĭevs: "When we do that, we lose control of the documents, we can't get at the history, we can't search them, we can't even find stuff in there, and SharePoint is slow and the permissions are always wrong, and a year after the project ships the SharePoint will be destroyed and we will lose all of the documentation.". Like, having whole separate doc folders for Beta 1 and Beta 2 (there's going to be a second beta, and the docs are going to be cloned into those? Really?) Start a project and -poof- your most unfavorite PM has creates a procrustean bed of document folders, all set for you to lose your documents in because none of the categories match anything in the actual product. Inside MS, SharePoint is often used to "track" project documents. Unfortunately it's a money making piece of garbage, so there you go. SharePoint has always been a piece of garbage.
0 kommentar(er)
